Loan to cost (LTC)
Loan to cost (LTC) is the percentage derived at origination by dividing an extension of credit by the total cost of the property plus all construction costs. The OCC CRE handbook defines LTC in those terms and treats it as a companion equity test to loan-to-value. Where the asset is still being built, cost is observable from the budget and land basis; market value is still prospective.
Loan to cost on bank CRE desks
CRE construction and development desks use LTC to confirm that the borrower injects hard equity before and during draws on a construction loan. OCC guidance states that prudent policies establish loan limits as a maximum percentage of cost as well as of market value, so that the sponsor retains economic interest and a cushion for overruns and lease-up shortfalls. Equity that counts toward the cost base typically includes cash, marketable securities, land purchased with cash, and upfront soft costs such as architecture, engineering and permits. Deferred developer profit, unearned fees and holding costs on contributed land are generally not treated as equity.
LTC binds most tightly while the project generates little or no operating cash flow. Desks therefore combine LTC with completion and disbursement controls, interest-reserve sizing, and prospective loan to value (LTV) against as-complete or as-stabilised appraisals. Take-out capacity is still tested against projected net operating income and debt service coverage ratio (DSCR) once the asset stabilises.
Calculation and institutional monitoring
In OCC terms the ratio is:
- Numerator: extension of credit at origination (including senior liens where relevant to the facility)
- Denominator: total property cost plus all construction costs
The European Systemic Risk Board recommends that for CRE property under development, authorities may monitor LTC instead of LTV at origination. ESRB materials define LTC as the initial amount of all loans granted relative to the costs associated with construction of the property until completion. That framing treats LTC as the development-phase leverage indicator in the EU real-estate data-gap framework, while LTV remains the stock and flow metric for completed income-producing assets.
National supervisory practice can harden the metric into an explicit ceiling. ESRB Occasional Paper No 29 notes Danish guidelines that set a maximum LTC of 65 percent for CRE development projects, assessed jointly with LTV, DSCR, interest coverage and leverage.
Distinctions from LTV and permanent leverage tests
LTC asks what was spent; LTV asks what the collateral is worth. A project can pass LTC and still fail as-stabilised LTV or debt-yield tests if costs approach or exceed income-supported value. OCC guidance stresses that expected costs and the value supported by projected NOI should be considered together: construction costs that closely approach or exceed income-supported value generally indicate weak feasibility. LTC is therefore a budget and equity discipline for the build phase, not a substitute for permanent cash-flow underwriting.